Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

OTTO SVERDRUP

IMO: 9231951
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EEXI 36.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: FINNMARKEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

77.6

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

745

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

12.5 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,540 t

CO₂ emitted

17,761 t

Distance sailed

71,389 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,701 h

238 days, 65% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 150 (−51%)

69.3Ranks 50 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 15.8 (−23%)

12.0Faster than 10% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 514 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−9%)

66.8Ranks 190 of 408, lowest first1,569

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU2%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,115 t

11.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OTTO SVERDRUP
Ro-pax median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OTTO SVERDRUP
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

OTTO SVERDRUP
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

OTTO SVERDRUP
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−9%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−10%	−12%	+8%	−25%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	−3%	+20%	−6%	−0%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	+166%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2021	−3.3 kn	−3%	−27%	−68%	+77%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	+4%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,140	16,480	70,182	5,801	12.1	73.2	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,385	17,266	76,874	6,343	12.1	70.1	–	–
2023	not published	5,540	17,761	71,389	5,701	12.5	77.6	–	–
2022	not published	6,094	19,537	75,991	7,522	10.1	80.2	–	–
2021	not published	2,335	7,487	28,554	2,795	10.2	81.8	–	–
2019	not published	7,561	24,241	89,561	6,634	13.5	84.4	–	–
2018	not published	7,163	22,963	86,356	6,347	13.6	82.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	514	567	−9%	190 of 408	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	556	547	+2%	206 of 404	–	–	–	DNV	C
2023	not published	745	680	+10%	215 of 386	–	–	–	DNV	C
2022	not published	748	831	−10%	84 of 187	–	–	–	DNV	C
2021	not published	997	1,315	−24%	31 of 100	–	–	–	DNV	C
2019	not published	564	569	−1%	195 of 394	346	223	+56%	DNV	C
2018	not published	546	729	−25%	154 of 361	1,016	184	+452%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.