Navalyze · Container · Ship

GLASGOW EXPRESS

IMO: 9232589
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,618 t
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,618 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

173.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.48

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+26%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,963 t

CO₂ emitted

37,492 t

38,079 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

68,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,036 h

252 days, 69% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 173.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,082 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.48 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+26%)

7.22Ranks 1,367 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU32%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU3%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,973 t).

Fuel burned laden

96%

4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	+0%	−17%	+18%	−7%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+0%	+3%	+33%	+1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−2%	+10%	+36%	−0%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+4%	−6%	−18%	−7%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−3%	−10%	−28%	−12%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−18%	−0%	+4%	+7%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+5%	−23%	+11%	+7%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	11,963	37,492	68,776	6,036	11.4	173.9	20.48	96%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	10,143	30,530	58,413	4,256	13.7	173.7	21.91	90%
2023	not published	7,624	23,850	44,000	3,298	13.3	173.3	21.70	95%
2022	not published	5,709	17,942	32,427	2,726	11.9	176.1	21.72	91%
2021	not published	6,682	20,938	39,513	3,008	13.1	169.1	23.32	–
2020	not published	9,537	29,893	54,547	3,872	14.1	174.8	26.48	–
2019	not published	11,195	35,018	52,291	4,528	11.5	214.1	24.71	–
2018	not published	9,577	29,856	47,062	2,973	15.8	203.5	23.14	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	20.48	16.30	+26%	1,367 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	21.91	17.52	+25%	1,222 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	21.70	19.40	+12%	1,069 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.72	19.13	+14%	1,020 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	23.32	17.90	+30%	1,127 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	26.48	17.58	+51%	1,263 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	24.71	18.88	+31%	1,112 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	23.14	20.22	+14%	977 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.