Navalyze · Container · Ship

GLASGOW EXPRESS

IMO: 9232589
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,618 t
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,101 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

214

Container median 174 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+31%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,195 t

CO₂ emitted

35,018 t

Distance sailed

52,291 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,528 h

189 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 177 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,082 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+26%)

7.22Ranks 1,367 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU38%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,516 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLASGOW EXPRESS
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	+0%	−17%	+18%	−7%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+0%	+3%	+33%	+1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−2%	+10%	+36%	−0%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+4%	−6%	−18%	−7%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−3%	−10%	−28%	−12%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−18%	−0%	+4%	+7%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+5%	−23%	+11%	+7%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	11,963	37,492	68,776	6,036	11.4	174	20.5	96%
2024Bio blend	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	10,143	30,530	58,413	4,256	13.7	174	21.9	90%
2023	not published	7,624	23,850	44,000	3,298	13.3	173	21.7	95%
2022	not published	5,709	17,942	32,427	2,726	11.9	176	21.7	91%
2021	not published	6,682	20,938	39,513	3,008	13.1	169	23.3	–
2020	not published	9,537	29,893	54,547	3,872	14.1	175	26.5	–
2019	not published	11,195	35,018	52,291	4,528	11.5	214	24.7	–
2018	not published	9,577	29,856	47,062	2,973	15.8	204	23.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	20.5	16.3	+26%	1,367 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024Bio blend	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	21.9	17.5	+25%	1,222 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	21.7	19.4	+12%	1,069 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.7	19.1	+14%	1,020 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	23.3	17.9	+30%	1,127 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	26.5	17.6	+51%	1,263 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	24.7	18.9	+31%	1,112 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	23.1	20.2	+14%	977 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.