Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TROLLFJORD

IMO: 9233258
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EEXI 34.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

91.0

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

594

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,122

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+510%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,669 t

CO₂ emitted

24,587 t

Distance sailed

84,293 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,726 h

280 days, 77% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.4 kg/nm · median 150 (−52%)

69.3Ranks 46 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 15.8 (−21%)

12.0Faster than 12% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 567 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+0%)

66.8Ranks 205 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 7,892 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+3,017%)

48.6Ranks 408 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,221 t

13.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TROLLFJORD
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TROLLFJORD
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

TROLLFJORD
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

TROLLFJORD
Ro-pax median

500600700800

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−12%	−7%	+12%	−16%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+6%	−2%	+3%	−1%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−15%	+4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	−0.3 kn	−6%	−7%	+85%	−11%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−52%	+38%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−6%	−1%	+4%	−10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,463	17,516	76,532	6,144	12.5	71.4	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,565	17,840	68,594	5,858	11.7	81.1	–	–
2023	not published	5,093	16,328	66,524	5,268	12.6	76.6	–	–
2022	not published	6,490	20,807	78,047	5,986	13.0	83.2	–	–
2020	not published	3,715	11,912	42,177	3,171	13.3	88.1	–	–
2019	not published	7,516	24,097	87,927	6,649	13.2	85.5	–	–
2018	not published	7,669	24,587	84,293	6,726	12.5	91.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	567	567	+0%	205 of 408	7,892	253	+3,017%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	672	547	+23%	227 of 404	5,090	233	+2,086%	DNV	C
2023	not published	680	680	−0%	193 of 386	1,688	234	+621%	DNV	C
2022	not published	653	626	+4%	203 of 394	568	253	+124%	DNV	C
2020	not published	738	751	−2%	192 of 387	539	217	+148%	DNV	C
2019	not published	536	569	−6%	187 of 394	295	223	+32%	DNV	C
2018	not published	594	729	−18%	163 of 361	1,122	184	+510%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.