Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DSM FERRO

IMO: 9236092
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,150 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KARTERIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,150 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

87.0 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+4%)

Average speed

8.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

797 t

CO₂ emitted

2,492 t

2,531 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,158 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,110 h

46 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 87.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+5%)

61.0Ranks 2,162 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.2 kn · median 10.7 (−23%)

8.8Faster than 7% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+4%)

4.80Ranks 1,939 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU19%
Into the EU73%
At berth in the EU8%

48% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,204 t).

Fuel burned laden

81%

19% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

DSM FERRO
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DSM FERRO
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DSM FERRO
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	+15%	−26%	−67%	+4%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−17%	−22%	+146%	−35%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.6 kn	−31%	−15%	+181%	+12%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022	−0.8 kn	+87%	+75%	−55%	−46%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 87%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.6 kn	−22%	+12%	−50%	+133%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	89	279	1,120	92	12.2	79.8	8.24	–
2025	Stemship Management Ltd	797	2,492	9,158	1,110	8.2	87.0	8.21	81%
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	2,109	6,688	27,773	2,179	12.7	75.9	7.88	–
2023	not published	1,028	3,245	11,298	829	13.6	91.0	12.09	–
2022	not published	533	1,677	4,019	364	11.0	132.6	10.82	–
2019	not published	632	1,972	8,912	756	11.8	71.0	20.00	–
2018	not published	1,624	5,080	17,808	2,179	8.2	91.2	8.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2025	Stemship Management Ltd	8.21	7.89	+4%	1,939 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	7.88	8.09	−3%	1,452 of 3,089	RINA	B
2023	not published	12.09	8.27	+46%	2,785 of 3,548	RINA	B
2022	not published	10.82	8.71	+24%	2,714 of 3,968	RINA	B
2019	not published	20.00	8.38	+139%	3,195 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	8.60	8.50	+1%	1,729 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.