Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

PATRIS

IMO: 9242388
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,865 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UND ATILIM, CAPPADOCIA SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S. · part of DFDS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,420 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

109

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

77.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−25%)

Average speed

18.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,502 t

CO₂ emitted

29,656 t

Distance sailed

86,979 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,801 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 111 kg/nm · median 105 (+7%)

56.6Ranks 133 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 17.4 kn · median 14.4 (+21%)

10.9Faster than 94% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−6%)

47.4Ranks 110 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU44%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

492 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PATRIS
Ro-ro median

102.5105.0107.5110.0112.5115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PATRIS
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PATRIS
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+4%	+14%	+28%	−30%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	−2%	−14%	−30%	+47%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−1%	−4%	−9%	+6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−2%	+1%	+26%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+20%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−3%	−7%	−33%	−14%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−0%	+2%	+3%	+6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	11,762	36,649	106,209	6,112	17.4	111	89.3	–
2025	SALAMIS LINES LTD	11,831	36,868	106,216	6,120	17.4	111	89.8	–
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	8,879	27,677	82,704	5,246	15.8	107	129	–
2023	not published	12,962	40,384	118,779	6,600	18.0	109	87.4	–
2022	not published	14,378	44,791	130,967	7,006	18.7	110	82.2	–
2021	not published	11,714	36,497	104,296	5,782	18.0	112	96.9	–
2020	not published	9,502	29,656	86,979	4,801	18.1	109	77.1	–
2019	not published	14,518	45,239	129,066	6,845	18.9	113	89.3	–
2018	not published	14,087	43,883	125,051	6,753	18.5	113	84.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	SALAMIS LINES LTD	89.8	95.2	−6%	110 of 235	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	129	97.5	+32%	134 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	87.4	109	−20%	85 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	82.2	90.6	−9%	90 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	96.9	104	−7%	99 of 219	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	77.1	103	−25%	75 of 238	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	89.3	90.9	−2%	128 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	84.5	91.0	−7%	110 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.