Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

XANTHIA

IMO: 9246152
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,341 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Utkilen AS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,487 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.0

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+65%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,842 t

CO₂ emitted

15,426 t

Distance sailed

68,150 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,442 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−21%)

52.8Ranks 331 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 81% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+82%)

7.93Ranks 1,134 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,236 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

XANTHIA
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

XANTHIA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

XANTHIA
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+0%	+4%	+12%	+6%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−22%	−11%	+236%	−14%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+15%	+5%	−64%	+1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+8%	−4%	−16%	+12%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	−4%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+4%	+9%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+2%	+11%	+4%	−5%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Utkilen AS	4,654	14,858	73,923	6,132	12.1	63.0	27.4	–
2024	Utkilen AS	4,154	13,269	65,961	5,681	11.6	63.0	25.8	–
2023	not published	1,576	5,011	19,631	1,919	10.2	80.3	29.9	–
2022	not published	3,853	12,351	55,202	4,923	11.2	69.8	29.8	–
2021	not published	4,248	13,620	65,468	5,196	12.6	64.9	26.5	–
2020	not published	4,842	15,426	68,150	5,442	12.5	71.0	26.7	–
2019	not published	5,087	16,045	74,722	6,240	12.0	68.1	27.0	–
2018	not published	4,790	15,110	72,060	6,522	11.0	66.5	28.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Utkilen AS	27.4	15.0	+82%	1,134 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	Utkilen AS	25.8	16.7	+54%	919 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	29.9	16.2	+84%	1,024 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	29.8	16.1	+85%	1,124 of 1,409	DNV	C
2021	not published	26.5	16.7	+59%	1,001 of 1,343	DNV	C
2020	not published	26.7	16.2	+65%	998 of 1,312	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.0	17.3	+56%	997 of 1,321	DNV	C
2018	not published	28.3	17.1	+65%	1,000 of 1,294	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.