Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Utkilen ASyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Utkilen AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 12 |
| CO₂ emitted | 112 kt−9.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 52 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Utkilen AS33.5 (+123% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utkilen AS | 12 | 33.5 | +123% | 52 | 11.2 | 5,056 | 9.4% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utkilen AS | DNV (12) | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Utkilen AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORDSTRAUM | 9523548 | Chemical tanker | 53.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +36% | 10.6 | 9,477 t | €450k |
| XANTHIA | 9246152 | Chemical tanker | 27.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +28% | 12.1 | 14,858 t | €765k |
| LATANA | 9186352 | Chemical tanker | 26.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +23% | 11.9 | 11,923 t | €626k |
| BERGSTRAUM | 9108740 | Chemical tanker | 37.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −5% | 11.0 | 9,036 t | €440k |
| GOLFSTRAUM | 9390991 | Chemical tanker | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −8% | 10.8 | 8,820 t | €446k |
| CHRISTINA | 9118496 | Chemical tanker | 35.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −9% | 10.7 | 8,122 t | €405k |
| VIKSTRAUM | 9829796 | Chemical tanker | 35.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −11% | 11.2 | 7,747 t | €394k |
| SALTSTRAUM | 9854466 | Chemical tanker | 33.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −14% | 10.8 | 7,844 t | €403k |
| RYSTRAUM | 9391000 | Chemical tanker | 33.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −15% | 11.0 | 8,196 t | €405k |
| SYDSTRAUM | 9854478 | Chemical tanker | 31.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −20% | 10.8 | 7,600 t | €395k |
| MOSTRAUM | 9829784 | Chemical tanker | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −22% | 11.2 | 7,593 t | €343k |
| FINNSTRAUM | 9172222 | Chemical tanker | 24.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −38% | 11.8 | 10,877 t | €571k |
30 of 12 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.