Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MAUD

IMO: 9247728
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: TromsØ
Technical efficiency: EEXI 35.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: MIDNATSOL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

74.3 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

641

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

865

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+242%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,756 t

CO₂ emitted

21,659 t

21,991 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

90,961 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,695 h

279 days, 76% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.3 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−51%)

69.3Ranks 54 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 15.8 (−14%)

12.0Faster than 25% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 641.11 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+13%)

66.76Ranks 215 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 864.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+242%)

48.59Ranks 328 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU12%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (21,659 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAUD
Ro-pax median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAUD
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MAUD
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’182018’192019’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MAUD
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.5 kn	−28%	−12%	+241%	−37%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+40%	+34%	−51%	+15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	−15%	−1%	+1%	−42%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+17%	+14%	+172%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−1.8 kn	−9%	−23%	−66%	+129%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.2 kn	−2%	+32%	+58%	+25%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	6,756	21,659	90,961	6,695	13.6	74.3	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	2,751	8,820	26,698	2,395	11.1	103.0	–	–
2023	not published	4,052	12,991	55,004	4,732	11.6	73.7	–	–
2022	not published	4,723	15,141	54,298	5,453	10.0	87.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,481	4,748	19,995	1,946	10.3	74.1	–	–
2019	not published	4,737	15,187	57,964	4,800	12.1	81.7	–	–
2018	not published	3,077	9,864	36,770	4,118	8.9	83.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	641.11	566.51	+13%	215 of 408	864.72	253.18	+242%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	1,011.48	546.68	+85%	293 of 404	1,154.23	232.85	+396%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	876.46	680.04	+29%	237 of 386	–	–	–	DNV	C
2022	not published	1,523.55	830.76	+83%	142 of 187	–	–	–	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,429.43	1,314.88	+9%	55 of 100	–	–	–	DNV	C
2019	not published	623.61	569.03	+10%	212 of 394	507.97	222.56	+128%	DNV	C
2018	not published	498.21	728.92	−32%	150 of 361	1,047.33	184.05	+469%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.