Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SHANDONG JUNIPER

IMO: 9253222
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: GEMMATA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

247

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.5

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+17%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,919 t

CO₂ emitted

27,426 t

Distance sailed

40,236 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,959 h

123 days, 34% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 282 kg/nm · median 231 (+22%)

167Ranks 235 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.2 (−21%)

10.7Faster than 13% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 21.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+136%)

5.47Ranks 329 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

5,327 t

54% of all fuel; 46% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

812 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

225.0250.0275.0300.0325.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+3%	+14%	−90%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+8%	−1%	+15%	+107%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−1%	−7%	−37%	−18%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+8%	+3%	+30%	+2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−10%	−7%	−22%	+19%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−6%	−6%	−13%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	1,121	3,085	3,841	312	12.3	292	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,696	29,531	37,924	3,377	11.2	282	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,623	23,776	32,907	2,688	12.2	262	–	54%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,912	38,568	52,473	4,034	13.0	265	–	47%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9,919	27,426	40,236	2,959	13.6	247	–	54%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14,214	39,716	51,818	3,952	13.1	274	–	67%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	17,446	49,253	59,516	4,548	13.1	293	–	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	21.5	9.10	+136%	329 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10.4	10.4	+0%	191 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12.7	10.5	+22%	195 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.5	10.7	+17%	181 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10.5	10.9	−3%	118 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.9	+24%	147 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.