Navalyze · Container · Ship

MONTREAL EXPRESS

IMO: 9253741
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,657 t
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,312 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

184

Container median 182 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−5%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,435 t

CO₂ emitted

55,166 t

Distance sailed

94,591 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,874 h

286 days, 78% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 177 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,080 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 13.3 (−22%)

9.1Faster than 18% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+13%)

7.22Ranks 1,250 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU54%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,929 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,070 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MONTREAL EXPRESS
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MONTREAL EXPRESS
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MONTREAL EXPRESS
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.1 kn	+1%	−16%	+5%	−13%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	−13%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−11%	−19%	−28%	+7%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	+52%	−13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+16%	+18%	−46%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−6%	+6%	+1%	−7%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+3%	−8%	−7%	+7%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	8,271	25,957	47,593	4,562	10.4	174	18.4	97%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	7,790	24,384	45,401	3,624	12.5	172	21.0	87%
2023	not published	8,695	27,273	51,911	4,155	12.5	168	19.6	98%
2022	not published	13,562	42,558	72,223	5,262	13.7	188	18.3	98%
2021	not published	9,936	31,388	47,626	3,397	14.0	209	21.2	95%
2020	not published	15,857	49,788	88,416	6,393	13.8	179	19.2	100%
2019	not published	16,664	52,531	87,674	7,122	12.3	190	20.6	99%
2018	not published	17,435	55,166	94,591	6,874	13.8	184	19.2	97%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	18.4	16.3	+13%	1,250 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	21.0	17.5	+20%	1,182 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	19.6	19.4	+1%	965 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	18.3	19.1	−4%	874 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	21.2	17.9	+18%	1,053 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	19.2	17.6	+9%	985 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.6	18.9	+9%	989 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	19.2	20.2	−5%	796 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.