Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CLIPPER MOON

IMO: 9253820
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 15,932 t
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Solvang ASA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,932 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

102.5 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 80.4 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.82 (−44%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.5 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,733 t

CO₂ emitted

11,682 t

11,866 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,426 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,647 h

110 days, 30% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2024

Set against all 306 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 102.5 kg/nm · median 80.4 (+27%)

51.6Ranks 223 of 306, lowest first125.8

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 12.5 (+10%)

9.3Faster than 75% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.82 (−44%)

15.04Ranks 76 of 306, lowest first115.00

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU44%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,566 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−10%	−14%	−3%	−25%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+1%	−4%	+1%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−7%	−9%	−30%	+22%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+12%	+29%	+53%	+3%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−13%	−10%	−28%	−24%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.6 kn	−11%	+38%	+45%	−18%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Solvang ASA	1,289	4,038	12,554	980	12.8	102.7	16.80	–
2024	Solvang ASA	3,733	11,682	36,426	2,647	13.8	102.5	20.13	–
2023	not published	4,295	13,423	37,540	2,627	14.3	114.4	26.89	–
2022	not published	4,211	13,179	37,047	2,477	15.0	113.7	24.48	–
2021	not published	6,474	20,245	52,976	3,470	15.3	122.2	20.02	–
2020	not published	3,771	11,810	34,666	2,614	13.3	108.8	19.43	–
2019	not published	6,003	18,767	47,847	3,740	12.8	125.5	25.48	–
2018	not published	4,650	14,539	32,941	4,012	8.2	141.2	30.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Solvang ASA	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	Solvang ASA	20.13	35.82	−44%	76 of 306	DNV	B
2023	not published	26.89	41.77	−36%	107 of 330	DNV	B
2022	not published	24.48	42.53	−42%	103 of 348	DNV	B
2021	not published	20.02	46.91	−57%	56 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	19.43	42.29	−54%	72 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	25.48	45.85	−44%	83 of 331	DNV	B
2018	not published	30.95	53.11	−42%	87 of 297	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.