Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

FUWAIRIT

IMO: 9256200
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd · part of MOL

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

406

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+45%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

147.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,461 t

CO₂ emitted

39,541 t

Distance sailed

33,145 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,188 h

91 days, 25% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 311 kg/nm · median 205 (+52%)

148Ranks 269 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 14.6 (+0%)

11.0Faster than 52% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.6 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+71%)

4.54Ranks 261 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

894 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FUWAIRIT
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FUWAIRIT
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

FUWAIRIT
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2024	−0.5 kn	−35%	−37%	−17%	−40%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+18%	+18%	−18%	+38%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−6%	−12%	+30%	−35%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−0%	+7%	−28%	+44%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	+6%	+36%	+30%	−6%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	6,934	18,765	22,305	1,526	14.6	311	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	12,972	38,109	27,018	1,787	15.1	480	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,461	39,541	33,145	2,188	15.1	406	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11,040	32,417	25,423	1,584	16.1	434	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	15,334	44,881	35,226	2,349	15.0	435	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11,176	32,560	27,162	2,323	11.7	411	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	12.6	7.39	+71%	261 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	20.9	10.4	+101%	326 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.1	10.5	+45%	233 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	23.2	10.7	+117%	253 of 267	DNV	A+B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	16.1	10.9	+48%	204 of 248	DNV	A+B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	17.2	10.9	+57%	174 of 197	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.