Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED CESME

IMO: 9256365
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,618 t
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DURANDE, MSC TURIN II

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,618 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

98.0 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+63%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−51%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,608 t

CO₂ emitted

8,207 t

8,335 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,606 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,076 h

170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 98.0 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 510 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.5 kn · median 13.3 (−51%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+63%)

7.22Ranks 1,603 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU39%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU12%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,128 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MED CESME
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED CESME
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED CESME
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−2%	+11%	+109%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+10%	−10%	+88%	+2%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−9.2 kn	−38%	−73%	−87%	−12%	9.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.5 kn	+34%	+70%	−5%	+25%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+6%	+14%	−11%	+10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+3%	+24%	−3%	+2%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.8 kn	−11%	+24%	+35%	−46%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	2,608	8,207	26,606	4,076	6.5	98.0	26.55	–
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	83	263	745	91	8.2	110.9	37.77	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,273	4,006	12,703	2,193	5.8	100.2	28.18	–
2023	not published	614	1,945	6,762	955	7.1	90.9	27.51	–
2022	not published	7,302	22,798	50,203	3,080	16.3	145.5	31.35	–
2021	not published	5,769	18,179	52,957	4,137	12.8	108.9	25.12	–
2020	not published	6,095	19,205	59,429	4,952	12.0	102.5	22.90	–
2019	not published	6,076	19,345	61,079	6,145	9.9	99.5	22.35	–
2018	not published	5,091	15,912	45,307	6,411	7.1	112.4	41.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	26.55	16.30	+63%	1,603 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	28.18	17.52	+61%	1,407 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	27.51	19.40	+42%	1,274 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	31.35	19.13	+64%	1,323 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	25.12	17.90	+40%	1,186 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	22.90	17.58	+30%	1,145 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	22.35	18.88	+18%	1,044 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	41.77	20.22	+107%	1,376 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.