Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED CESME

IMO: 9256365
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,618 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DURANDE, MSC TURIN II

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,408 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Container median 182 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+107%)

Average speed

7.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−49%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,091 t

CO₂ emitted

15,912 t

Distance sailed

45,307 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,411 h

267 days, 73% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 510 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.5 kn · median 13.3 (−51%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+63%)

7.22Ranks 1,603 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU34%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

509 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED CESME
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED CESME
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED CESME
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−2%	+11%	+109%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+10%	−10%	+88%	+2%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−9.2 kn	−38%	−73%	−87%	−12%	9.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.5 kn	+34%	+70%	−5%	+25%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+6%	+14%	−11%	+10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+3%	+24%	−3%	+2%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.8 kn	−11%	+24%	+35%	−46%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	2,608	8,207	26,606	4,076	6.5	98.0	26.6	–
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	83	263	745	91	8.2	111	37.8	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,273	4,006	12,703	2,193	5.8	100	28.2	–
2023	not published	614	1,945	6,762	955	7.1	90.9	27.5	–
2022	not published	7,302	22,798	50,203	3,080	16.3	146	31.4	–
2021	not published	5,769	18,179	52,957	4,137	12.8	109	25.1	–
2020	not published	6,095	19,205	59,429	4,952	12.0	103	22.9	–
2019	not published	6,076	19,345	61,079	6,145	9.9	99.5	22.4	–
2018	not published	5,091	15,912	45,307	6,411	7.1	112	41.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	26.6	16.3	+63%	1,603 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	28.2	17.5	+61%	1,407 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	27.5	19.4	+42%	1,274 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	31.4	19.1	+64%	1,323 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	25.1	17.9	+40%	1,186 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	22.9	17.6	+30%	1,145 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	22.4	18.9	+18%	1,044 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	41.8	20.2	+107%	1,376 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.