Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT ST.GEORGES

IMO: 9261918
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,641 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,277 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

176

Container median 182 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+90%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,687 t

CO₂ emitted

49,048 t

Distance sailed

89,325 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,774 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.5 kg/nm · median 167 (−42%)

78.9Ranks 476 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 13.5 (−25%)

9.6Faster than 13% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 64.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (+270%)

7.33Ranks 1,885 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU35%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

976 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT ST.GEORGES
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT ST.GEORGES
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT ST.GEORGES
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2024	−1.5 kn	−30%	−39%	−82%	+96%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+7%	+4%	−32%	+30%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−3.5 kn	−11%	−31%	+14%	−20%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−17%	−18%	−57%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	CMA CGM SA	511	1,592	5,290	522	10.1	96.5	64.8	99%
2021	not published	4,078	12,879	29,668	2,554	11.6	137	33.1	90%
2020	not published	5,596	17,662	43,378	3,647	11.9	129	25.6	–
2019	not published	5,533	17,328	38,125	2,473	15.4	145	32.0	–
2018	not published	15,687	49,048	89,325	5,774	15.5	176	38.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMA CGM SA	64.8	17.5	+270%	1,885 of 1,974	ABS	C
2021	not published	33.1	17.9	+85%	1,368 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	25.6	17.6	+45%	1,240 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	32.0	18.9	+69%	1,300 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	38.5	20.2	+90%	1,318 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.