Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ATHARA

IMO
9263655
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Cagliari
Technical efficiency
EEXI 24.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
232
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+46%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,150
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+58%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
132
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−28%)
Average speed
18.2 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
101.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
16,541 t
CO₂ emitted
51,655 t
Distance sailed
71,352 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,911 h
163 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 237 kg/nm · median 150 (+58%)
69.3Ranks 374 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 15.8 (+8%)
12.0Faster than 63% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,124 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+98%)
66.8Ranks 322 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 73.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−71%)
48.6Ranks 64 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports89%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU11%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5,832 t
11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ATHARA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • ATHARA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ATHARA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ATHARA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.6 kn−8%−11%+11%+13%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.8 kn+8%+3%−6%−10%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.5 kn−4%−7%−19%+2%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−1.3 kn−1%−7%+70%+8%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.1 kn+9%+21%−34%−39%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.0 kn+4%+10%+9%+57,225%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.0 kn−3%−8%−7%−100%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione16,45251,90169,4454,05317.1237––
2024Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione16,14750,46262,5343,53817.7258––
2023not published15,83049,46766,3463,58518.5239––
2022not published20,47363,92481,9914,30819.0250––
2021not published12,19738,09148,1382,37520.3253––
2020not published16,89452,77472,4433,97118.2233––
2019not published14,97046,76966,5443,86217.2225––
2018not published16,54151,65571,3523,91118.2232––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione1,124567+98%322 of 40873.9253−71%RINAA
2024Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione996547+82%291 of 40487.1233−63%RINAA
2023not published1,111680+63%303 of 38699.6234−57%RINA–
2022not published1,092626+74%290 of 39495.0253−62%RINAA
2021not published1,010815+24%227 of 37794.1226−58%RINAA
2020not published1,668751+122%307 of 387140217−36%RINAA
2019not published2.91569−99%22 of 3940.36223−100%RINAA
2018not published1,150729+58%240 of 361132184−28%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.