Navalyze · Container · Ship

RUMBA

IMO: 9264714
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,520 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.23 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Myklebusthaug Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,520 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

56.8 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−66%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

71.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+311%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,075 t

CO₂ emitted

13,010 t

13,210 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,784 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,680 h

237 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.8 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−66%)

78.9Ranks 24 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.5 (−7%)

9.6Faster than 35% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 71.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+311%)

7.33Ranks 1,913 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU9%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU5%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RUMBA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

RUMBA
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RUMBA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+11%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+39%	+5%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+2%	−11%	−32%	+9%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	+4%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+3%	+4%	+12%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	+2%	+14%	−9%	−1%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	356	1,108	6,759	502	13.5	52.6	574.81	–
2024	Myklebusthaug Management AS	4,075	13,010	71,784	5,680	12.6	56.8	71.93	–
2023	not published	3,557	11,402	64,569	5,194	12.4	55.1	75.42	–
2022	not published	2,925	9,352	46,605	4,024	11.6	62.8	71.60	–
2021	not published	4,186	13,421	68,222	5,159	13.2	61.4	65.71	–
2020	not published	4,066	13,031	65,851	4,930	13.4	61.8	60.25	–
2019	not published	3,536	11,319	58,868	4,463	13.2	60.1	61.37	–
2018	not published	3,829	12,232	64,979	5,506	11.8	58.9	62.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Myklebusthaug Management AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Myklebusthaug Management AS	71.93	17.52	+311%	1,913 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	75.42	19.40	+289%	1,869 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	71.60	19.13	+274%	1,770 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	65.71	17.90	+267%	1,713 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	60.25	17.58	+243%	1,689 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	61.37	18.88	+225%	1,666 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	62.24	20.22	+208%	1,591 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.