Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Myklebusthaug Management ASyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 15 |
| CO₂ emitted | 96 kt+58.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 58 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Myklebusthaug Management AS55.7 (+242% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | 5 | 55.7 | +242% | 79 | 11.2 | 3,728 | 6.2% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Offshore
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 1,367
- Myklebusthaug Management AS396 (−71% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | 6 | 396 | −71% | 71 | 4.9 | 3,983 | 7.3% | – |
| Segment median | 1,367 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Myklebusthaug Management AS34.8 (+37% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | 4 | 34.8 | +37% | 38 | 9.9 | 5,056 | 4.0% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myklebusthaug Management AS | DNV (15) | 53% | 53% | 80% | 0% |
Myklebusthaug Management AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DINA | 9226786 | General cargo | 59.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +132% | 8.4 | 5,850 t | €294k |
| RS LISA | 9287704 | Container | 68.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +53% | 10.2 | 8,515 t | €160k |
| GRINNA | 9318955 | General cargo | 38.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +51% | 10.1 | 5,764 t | €255k |
| CONESTE | 9252802 | Container | 59.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +32% | 14.4 | 13,945 t | €724k |
| EDMY | 9263540 | General cargo | 31.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +23% | 10.8 | 6,682 t | €266k |
| JULIE | 9277307 | General cargo | 29.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +17% | 10.3 | 6,011 t | €258k |
| DINA TRADER | 9354442 | Container | 52.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +17% | 8.2 | 6,700 t | €227k |
| ANDREA | 9333357 | Container | 47.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +6% | 11.2 | 11,937 t | €612k |
| DINA MERKUR | 9344332 | Offshore | 462 g CO₂/t·nm | 467 | −1% | 4.4 | 4,057 t | €0 |
| DINA SUPPORTER | 9402342 | Offshore | 329 g CO₂/t·nm | 467 | −30% | 5.5 | 4,863 t | €0 |
30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.