Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EL DJAZAIR II

IMO: 9265421
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Algeria
Port of registry: Algiers
Technical efficiency: EEDI 26.73 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Entreprise Nationale de Transport Maritime de Voyageurs

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

181

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

162

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−80%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

659

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+192%)

Average speed

18.5 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

927 t

CO₂ emitted

2,922 t

Distance sailed

5,123 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

277 h

12 days, 3% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 163 kg/nm · median 150 (+9%)

69.3Ranks 247 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 20.3 kn · median 15.8 (+28%)

12.0Faster than 84% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,526 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+169%)

66.8Ranks 364 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,256 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+396%)

48.6Ranks 368 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU51%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

158 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EL DJAZAIR II
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EL DJAZAIR II
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

EL DJAZAIR II
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

EL DJAZAIR II
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+3%	−0%	−21%	+20%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−17%	−13%	+47%	+1,244%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	+9%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+6%	+15%	+866%	−45%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−10%	−13%	−66%	+20%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−6%	−11%	−77%	−90%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Entreprise Nationale de Transport Maritime de Voyageurs	10,257	32,751	62,909	3,104	20.3	163	–	–
2024	Entreprise Nationale de Transport Maritime de Voyageurs	12,493	39,390	79,163	3,775	21.0	158	–	–
2023	not published	10,186	32,118	53,831	2,684	20.1	189	–	–
2022	not published	9,478	29,907	49,499	2,456	20.2	192	–	–
2021	not published	927	2,922	5,123	277	18.5	181	–	–
2020	not published	3,009	9,488	14,963	782	19.1	201	–	–
2019	not published	14,221	44,830	66,478	3,282	20.3	214	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Entreprise Nationale de Transport Maritime de Voyageurs	1,526	567	+169%	364 of 408	1,256	253	+396%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2024	Entreprise Nationale de Transport Maritime de Voyageurs	1,277	547	+134%	322 of 404	752	233	+223%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2023	not published	95.0	680	−86%	56 of 386	1,063	234	+354%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2022	not published	89.0	626	−86%	57 of 394	1,056	253	+317%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2021	not published	162	815	−80%	86 of 377	659	226	+192%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2020	not published	134	751	−82%	87 of 387	1,202	217	+453%	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2019	not published	1,349	569	+137%	330 of 394	36.2	223	−84%	Bureau Veritas	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.