Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ENUGU

IMO: 9266994
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

318

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+21%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,532 t

CO₂ emitted

44,068 t

Distance sailed

48,923 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,544 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 252 kg/nm · median 190 (+33%)

152Ranks 292 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)

11.2Faster than 25% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+42%)

5.06Ranks 296 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

947 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ENUGU
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ENUGU
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ENUGU
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+4.8 kn	−2%	+54%	−41%	−42%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.2 kn	+6%	−30%	−1%	+49%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.1 kn	−8%	+10%	−3%	−17%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+0%	−10%	−38%	+1%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	−11%	+6%	+19%	+17%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.0 kn	−6%	−33%	−16%	−10%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+9%	+21%	+46%	−16%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	4,318	11,900	17,108	1,298	13.2	252	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	7,483	20,623	29,025	3,470	8.4	258	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,162	19,738	29,379	2,329	12.6	244	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,022	22,156	30,155	2,870	10.5	266	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,015	35,967	49,009	4,205	11.7	266	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,293	33,973	41,325	4,210	9.8	298	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	15,532	44,068	48,923	3,544	13.8	318	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	9,761	27,723	33,525	2,685	12.5	291	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	10.1	7.12	+42%	296 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	17.4	7.39	+135%	281 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	9.10	+28%	259 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.0	10.4	+35%	282 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13.9	10.5	+32%	215 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.8	10.7	+10%	165 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13.2	10.9	+21%	170 of 248	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	15.6	10.9	+43%	164 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.