Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

PROMINENT ACE

IMO: 9267699
Type: Vehicle carrier
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EIV 20.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,420 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.0

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

57.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (+2%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,395 t

CO₂ emitted

7,555 t

Distance sailed

24,181 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,464 h

61 days, 17% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 417 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.0 kg/nm · median 103 (−4%)

85.2Ranks 148 of 417, lowest first123

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 14.5 (+14%)

12.4Faster than 90% of vehicle carrier ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 57.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.6 (+2%)

38.9Ranks 216 of 417, lowest first107

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU62%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

2,067 t

86% of all fuel; 14% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

251 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PROMINENT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

PROMINENT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PROMINENT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+7%	+2%	+37%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+10%	+8%	−2%	−27%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	+8%	+50%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+18%	+41%	−56%	+22%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	−1.7 kn	−15%	−24%	+104%	−19%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	3,521	10,980	33,173	2,110	15.7	106	–	91%
2023	not published	2,395	7,555	24,181	1,464	16.5	99.0	57.7	86%
2022	not published	2,233	7,053	24,706	1,471	16.8	90.4	78.9	47%
2021	not published	2,211	6,979	22,781	1,381	16.5	97.0	52.6	84%
2020	not published	4,272	13,490	51,961	3,756	13.8	82.2	43.1	92%
2018	not published	2,459	7,692	25,505	1,650	15.5	96.4	53.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	57.7	56.6	+2%	216 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	78.9	57.7	+37%	351 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	52.6	59.6	−12%	162 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	43.1	57.3	−25%	74 of 449	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	53.4	62.4	−14%	113 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.