Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

MOL
Ships75
CO₂ emitted1.2 Mt
Fuel per mile256 kg/nm
Average speed14.9 kn
CO₂ at berth0.4%
Ships burning LNG5
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • MOL9.7 (+31%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL229.7+31%28715.53,1610.7%5
Segment median 7.40%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • MOL50.3 (−9%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL3450.3−9%8912.42,9130.0%–
Segment median 55.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MOLClassNK (68), DNV (8)12%25%100%0%

MOL: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
FUWAIRITLNG9256200LNG carrier12.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+70%14.618,765 t€285k
POINT FORTINLNG9375721LNG carrier11.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+57%15.08,780 t€136k
VLADIMIR RUSANOVLNG9750701LNG carrier11.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+56%15.065,822 t€938k
FRAIHA9360817LNG carrier10.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+45%15.292,453 t€1.4m
AL AAMRIYA9338266LNG carrier8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+18%15.444,398 t€672k
MURWAB9360805LNG carrier8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+18%16.122,290 t€340k
LNG SCHNEEWEISSCHENLNG9771913LNG carrier7.8 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+5%16.336,923 t€572k
ETERNAL ACE9606479Vehicle carrier53.4 g CO₂/t·nm55.3−4%16.39,705 t€153k
LNG ROSENROTLNG9877133LNG carrier6.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−14%16.027,437 t€61k
AMETHYST ACE9397999Vehicle carrier47.1 g CO₂/t·nm55.3−15%10.810,615 t€164k

30 of 77 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.