Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGY SPIRIT

IMO: 9269207
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: GLOBAL ENERGY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

331

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

26.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+151%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−41%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,781 t

CO₂ emitted

38,241 t

Distance sailed

41,585 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,783 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 236 kg/nm · median 190 (+24%)

152Ranks 283 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 14.4 (−48%)

11.2Faster than 2% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 22.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+220%)

5.06Ranks 359 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

5,623 t

41% of all fuel; 59% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6,000 t

15.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.8 kn	−21%	−43%	+8%	+1%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	−24%	−8%	+30%	−26%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+20%	+45%	−22%	+16%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+4%	+2%	+11%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−4%	−21%	−5%	+9%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+8%	+12%	+23%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	−15%	+14%	−21%	−16%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,375	30,949	48,129	6,418	7.5	236	–	–
2024LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	13,334	36,443	44,443	4,298	10.3	300	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13,517	37,296	34,133	3,996	8.5	396	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,493	39,988	43,802	6,213	7.1	331	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12,521	34,832	39,360	5,489	7.2	318	–	35%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13,781	38,241	41,585	4,783	8.7	331	–	41%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10,367	28,682	33,844	4,034	8.4	306	–	15%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	15,354	42,322	42,802	6,836	6.3	359	–	36%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.8	7.12	+220%	359 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2024LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.6	7.39	+206%	290 of 312	ClassNK	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	30.6	9.10	+236%	338 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	26.4	10.4	+154%	341 of 379	Verifavia	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	29.4	10.5	+181%	272 of 289	Verifavia	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	26.9	10.7	+151%	257 of 267	Verifavia	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	24.8	10.9	+128%	230 of 248	Verifavia	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	29.4	10.9	+169%	190 of 197	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.