Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Ships133
CO₂ emitted703 kt−18.1%
Fuel per mile90 kg/nm
Average speed10.3 kn
CO₂ at berth6.8%
Ships burning LNG1
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED12.9 (−15%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED5412.9−15%7610.62,1666.0%–
Segment median 15.00%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED9.5 (+19%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED349.5+19%12710.11,4498.3%–
Segment median 8.00%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED7.6 (−4%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED427.6−4%8410.11,5613.7%–
Segment median 7.90%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED22.8 (+221%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED122.8+221%2367.56,41817.6%1
Segment median 7.10%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED112 (+214%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED1112+214%538.14,03313.9%–
Segment median 35.60%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED10.0 (−61%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED110.0−61%7012.01,4689.4%–
Segment median 25.50%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITEDClassNK (122), ABS (6), DNV (5)57%34%94%0%

FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
PAULA TRADER9855458Bulk carrier126 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+711%8.4478 t€14k
ENERGY SPIRITLNG9269207LNG carrier22.8 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+221%7.530,949 t€956k
SILVER GERTRUDE9683348Chemical tanker49.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+132%10.1862 t€30k
CYAN NOVA9534004Oil tanker9.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+107%10.014,322 t€427k
BANDA9337406Oil tanker18.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+77%7.12,936 t€0
EXPLORER AMERICA9566576Bulk carrier14.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+77%2.32,362 t€63k
SAMC SWAN9813058Chemical tanker56.8 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+45%9.51,455 t€54k
MAXWELL9782027Bulk carrier12.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+35%9.41,769 t€47k
YM IMPRESSION9764001Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+31%9.58,154 t€216k
FLORENCE9333242Oil tanker13.6 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+31%9.29,506 t€328k
MALBEC LEGEND9732814Chemical tanker15.0 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+30%7.010,615 t€327k
CABO MISAKI9755062Oil tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+27%11.63,360 t€87k
PACIFIC SARAH9772034Chemical tanker10.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+24%10.42,802 t€80k
LINUS P9749350Chemical tanker26.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+22%11.57,985 t€241k
YAS9439785Oil tanker12.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+19%11.13,305 t€104k
CAPRI9528392Chemical tanker9.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+18%10.84,633 t€96k
ATHENS VOYAGER9337391Oil tanker9.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+17%9.88,592 t€186k
BARBOUNI9416020Chemical tanker17.8 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+17%10.34,027 t€153k
BOCHEM OSLO9420710Chemical tanker17.8 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+17%11.13,875 t€115k
SAGAMI9379911Chemical tanker13.4 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+17%11.45,135 t€151k
RGL FIRST9772864Bulk carrier9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+16%10.93,475 t€92k
PALERMO9414292Oil tanker11.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+15%6.11,861 t€51k
ASP TREASURES9732242Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+15%8.723,060 t€716k
EVA BRISTOL9856323Bulk carrier7.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+15%9.11,627 t€46k
BOCHEM MUMBAI9565637Chemical tanker17.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+14%11.23,335 t€93k
HAKO9691814Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+12%9.44,747 t€133k
ALFRED N9749324Chemical tanker16.9 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+11%9.59,208 t€337k
PACIFIC NAFSIKA9732278Oil tanker7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+10%11.110,980 t€317k
PACIFIC A. DORODCHI9732266Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+10%11.05,826 t€165k
BOCHEM GHENT9565649Chemical tanker12.7 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+10%13.24,640 t€138k

30 of 133 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.