Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG LOKOJA

IMO: 9269960
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

281

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+11%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,895 t

CO₂ emitted

57,891 t

Distance sailed

74,384 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,359 h

265 days, 73% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 267 kg/nm · median 190 (+40%)

152Ranks 299 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

11.2Faster than 31% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+42%)

5.06Ranks 295 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

770 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG LOKOJA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG LOKOJA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG LOKOJA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.1 kn	−2%	+27%	−57%	−8%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+21%	+12%	−73%	+20%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−17%	−13%	+61%	−16%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−11%	−15%	−45%	−11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+8%	+5%	−3%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−4%	−14%	+26%	−1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−7%	−15%	+1%	−20%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	1,985	5,468	7,431	548	13.6	267	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	4,753	13,101	17,465	1,665	10.5	272	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	14,382	39,616	63,998	5,637	11.4	225	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,743	29,603	39,857	3,679	10.8	270	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	21,725	59,889	71,860	6,310	11.4	302	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	20,895	57,891	74,384	6,359	11.7	281	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	17,205	48,684	58,870	4,517	13.0	292	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	18,449	52,163	58,402	4,130	14.1	316	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	10.1	7.12	+42%	295 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	11.0	7.39	+49%	244 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9.17	9.10	+1%	179 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11.0	10.4	+6%	215 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12.3	10.5	+18%	186 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.9	10.7	+11%	166 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11.9	10.9	+10%	150 of 248	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.9	+36%	158 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.