Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ANWAAR LIBYA

IMO: 9275256
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,087 t
Flag (estimated): Libya
Port of registry: Tripoli
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.88 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: General National Maritime Transport Company

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,815 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.9

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+148%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,528 t

CO₂ emitted

4,774 t

Distance sailed

15,447 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,302 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.3 kg/nm · median 129 (−31%)

80.4Ranks 289 of 1,797, lowest first193

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 11.0 (−14%)

8.1Faster than 20% of oil tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+152%)

4.78Ranks 1,563 of 1,797, lowest first25.5

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

678 t

44% of all fuel; 56% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

285 t

6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANWAAR LIBYA
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

ANWAAR LIBYA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANWAAR LIBYA
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+2.6 kn	−8%	+26%	+70%	−5%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−16%	−45%	−6%	−23%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+17%	+3%	+7%	+31%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+6%	+48%	−0%	−5%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.8 kn	−20%	−40%	−34%	−9%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	General National Maritime Transport Company	128	400	1,019	96	10.6	126	22.2	–
2023	not published	2,351	7,337	26,323	2,781	9.5	89.3	21.3	49%
2022	not published	1,505	4,701	15,529	2,239	6.9	97.0	22.5	50%
2021	not published	1,914	5,978	16,506	1,576	10.5	116	29.2	42%
2020	not published	1,528	4,774	15,447	1,302	11.9	98.9	22.4	44%
2019	not published	1,445	4,522	15,479	1,826	8.5	93.4	23.5	44%
2018	not published	2,758	8,614	23,550	2,092	11.3	117	25.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	General National Maritime Transport Company	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	21.3	8.44	+152%	1,563 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	22.5	8.51	+164%	1,734 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	29.2	8.86	+230%	1,648 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	22.4	9.03	+148%	1,621 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	23.5	8.83	+166%	1,698 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	25.8	8.86	+191%	1,631 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.