Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK MONTE LINZOR

IMO: 9283186
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,183 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MONTE CERVANTES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,489 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

188

Container median 172 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−34%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,587 t

CO₂ emitted

45,785 t

Distance sailed

77,573 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,653 h

236 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 246 kg/nm · median 177 (+39%)

78.8Ranks 1,612 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 65% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+42%)

7.22Ranks 1,493 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU10%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

14,587 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,431 t

5.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK MONTE LINZOR
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK MONTE LINZOR
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK MONTE LINZOR
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	+19%	−1%	−8%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+14.6 kn	−34%	+359%	+214%	–	14.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−8.9 kn	+50%	−68%	−92%	+64%	8.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	+11%	−8%	−37%	+10%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−12%	−15%	+101%	−61%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	2,807	8,810	11,433	803	14.2	246	23.2	97%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	2,579	7,862	12,462	728	17.1	207	356	12%
2022	not published	1,247	3,922	3,975	1,620	2.5	314	21.1	64%
2021	not published	10,194	32,063	48,842	4,283	11.4	209	12.9	–
2020	not published	14,587	45,785	77,573	5,653	13.7	188	11.7	100%
2019	not published	8,191	25,759	38,531	2,709	14.2	213	30.3	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	23.2	16.3	+42%	1,493 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.1	19.1	+10%	993 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	12.9	17.9	−28%	538 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.7	17.6	−34%	489 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	30.3	18.9	+60%	1,268 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.