Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TIANJIN

IMO: 9285471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,586 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,494 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

302

Container median 172 kg/nm (+75%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−3%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,503 t

CO₂ emitted

63,971 t

Distance sailed

67,929 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,601 h

192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 273 kg/nm · median 177 (+54%)

78.8Ranks 1,819 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−12%)

7.22Ranks 965 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports57%
From the EU21%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,288 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	+4%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	+7%	+26%	+17%	+1%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	−12%	−30%	−9%	+11%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−1%	−10%	+125%	+5%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−7%	+1%	−70%	−24%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+157%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13,765	43,151	50,430	3,659	13.8	273	14.4	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	12,601	39,327	48,592	3,528	13.8	259	15.3	–
2023	not published	10,057	31,480	41,457	3,560	11.6	243	15.2	–
2022	not published	12,638	39,639	45,697	3,144	14.5	277	13.6	–
2021	not published	5,704	17,910	20,342	1,273	16.0	280	12.9	–
2020	not published	20,503	63,971	67,929	4,601	14.8	302	17.0	–
2019	not published	7,829	24,523	26,383	1,797	14.7	297	17.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	14.4	16.3	−12%	965 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	15.3	17.5	−13%	839 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.2	19.4	−22%	735 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	13.6	19.1	−29%	608 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	12.9	17.9	−28%	543 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	17.0	17.6	−3%	855 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	17.6	18.9	−7%	821 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.