Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC YOKOHAMA

IMO: 9285665
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,700 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: E.R. YOKOHAMA, 0081 E.R. YOKOHAMA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,231 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

252

Container median 165 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−18%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,556 t

CO₂ emitted

55,578 t

Distance sailed

69,587 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,426 h

226 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 200 kg/nm · median 167 (+20%)

78.9Ranks 1,184 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 3.6 kn · median 13.5 (−73%)

9.6Faster than 0% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−5%)

7.33Ranks 928 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU43%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,912 t

5.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC YOKOHAMA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MSC YOKOHAMA
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC YOKOHAMA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−9.2 kn	−21%	−78%	−98%	+4%	9.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−10%	−20%	−13%	+6%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	+24%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	+12%	+1%	+334%	+24%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−10%	−4%	−74%	−1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	+1%	+14%	−25%	−17%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	209	653	1,044	290	3.6	200	16.6	–
2023	not published	17,556	55,578	69,587	5,426	12.8	252	15.9	–
2022	not published	22,263	70,444	79,611	5,475	14.5	280	15.1	–
2021	not published	18,347	58,030	64,178	4,372	14.7	286	16.2	–
2020	not published	3,763	11,752	14,804	908	16.3	254	13.1	–
2019	not published	15,845	49,581	56,398	3,661	15.4	281	13.3	–
2018	not published	21,078	65,962	75,619	5,564	13.6	279	16.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	16.6	17.5	−5%	928 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.9	19.4	−18%	779 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.1	19.1	−21%	703 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	16.2	17.9	−9%	793 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.1	17.6	−25%	586 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	13.3	18.9	−29%	527 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.0	20.2	−21%	604 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.