Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VANCOUVER

IMO: 9285691
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,319 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.56 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: E.R. VANCOUVER, 0086 E.R. VANCOUVER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,343 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

286

Container median 178 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−19%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,747 t

CO₂ emitted

62,286 t

Distance sailed

69,054 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,719 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 231 kg/nm · median 167 (+38%)

78.9Ranks 1,344 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.5 (−4%)

9.6Faster than 39% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−32%)

7.33Ranks 598 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU43%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,413 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	−56%	−18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−9%	−23%	−58%	−6%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−13%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+14%	+7%	+4%	+12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−16%	−8%	+105%	−0%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+3%	+9%	−39%	−11%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,959	9,218	12,800	992	12.9	231	11.9	–
2023	not published	7,618	24,037	29,217	2,360	12.4	261	14.5	–
2022	not published	19,747	62,286	69,054	4,719	14.6	286	15.5	–
2021	not published	23,236	73,272	79,418	5,382	14.8	293	16.0	–
2020	not published	19,596	61,345	76,050	4,846	15.7	258	14.3	–
2019	not published	11,324	35,399	37,061	2,582	14.4	306	14.4	–
2018	not published	17,995	56,410	60,948	4,474	13.6	295	16.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11.9	17.5	−32%	598 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.5	19.4	−25%	708 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.5	19.1	−19%	735 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	16.0	17.9	−11%	777 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	14.3	17.6	−19%	688 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	14.4	18.9	−24%	601 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.0	20.2	−21%	609 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.