Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

STATENGRACHT

IMO: 9288045
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

99.0

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+65%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

25.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+22%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+40%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,550 t

CO₂ emitted

17,323 t

Distance sailed

56,070 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,825 h

159 days, 44% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+159%)

17.4Ranks 2,614 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 9.3 (+57%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−8%)

10.2Ranks 1,144 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU33%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

648 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STATENGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STATENGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

STATENGRACHT
General cargo median

17.520.022.525.027.530.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−2%	−6%	−6%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−6%	−3%	+15%	+9%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−6%	−8%	−7%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+12%	+16%	−16%	+35%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	+54%	−14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−1%	+11%	−10%	+25%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+2%	−5%	+3%	+0%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,574	17,394	61,131	4,187	14.6	91.2	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	6,010	18,757	64,727	4,263	15.2	92.9	–	–
2023	not published	5,550	17,323	56,070	3,825	14.7	99.0	–	–
2022	not published	6,353	19,853	60,542	4,011	15.1	105	–	–
2021	not published	6,738	21,015	71,776	4,908	14.6	93.9	–	–
2020	not published	4,708	14,688	46,490	3,282	14.2	101	–	–
2019	not published	5,282	16,479	51,746	4,091	12.6	102	30.8	–
2018	not published	5,018	15,659	50,056	3,688	13.6	100	29.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	23.6	25.5	−8%	1,144 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	27.5	19.3	+43%	849 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	25.2	20.7	+22%	698 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	26.7	21.6	+24%	690 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.8	22.7	−13%	432 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	23.2	24.5	−5%	522 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	18.5	25.0	−26%	293 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	18.5	24.9	−26%	282 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.