Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SAIMAAGRACHT

IMO: 9288069
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

96.8

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+62%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

26.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+29%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+32%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,544 t

CO₂ emitted

14,185 t

Distance sailed

46,965 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,369 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+180%)

17.4Ranks 2,669 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 9.3 (+57%)

6.9Faster than 99% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−14%)

10.2Ranks 1,010 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU42%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

654 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAIMAAGRACHT
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAIMAAGRACHT
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SAIMAAGRACHT
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.028.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−4%	+0%	+19%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−8%	−13%	+6%	+32%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+9%	−0%	−37%	−13%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	−0%	+9%	−2%	+1%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	+1%	+20%	+4%	+8%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	+1%	−13%	−1%	+2%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,635	17,618	57,278	3,927	14.6	98.4	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	5,191	16,207	55,856	3,851	14.5	92.9	–	–
2023	not published	4,544	14,185	46,965	3,369	13.9	96.8	–	–
2022	not published	4,686	14,639	44,317	3,005	14.7	106	–	–
2021	not published	6,807	21,226	70,167	4,357	16.1	97.0	–	–
2020	not published	6,998	21,832	71,949	4,878	14.7	97.3	–	–
2019	not published	6,627	20,674	69,006	5,562	12.4	96.0	31.4	–
2018	not published	6,641	20,709	69,569	4,836	14.4	95.5	26.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	21.9	25.5	−14%	1,010 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	25.1	19.3	+31%	785 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	26.6	20.7	+29%	743 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	20.2	21.6	−7%	452 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	23.2	22.7	+2%	600 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	23.0	24.5	−6%	515 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	21.2	25.0	−15%	397 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	20.8	24.9	−16%	371 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.