Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BESIKTAS BOSPHORUS

IMO: 9290373
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,135 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 65,971 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

194

Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.22

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+4%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,269 t

CO₂ emitted

32,123 t

Distance sailed

52,813 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,049 h

294 days, 80% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 317 kg/nm · median 129 (+145%)

80.4Ranks 1,786 of 1,797, lowest first193

Average speedThis ship 2.0 kn · median 11.0 (−82%)

8.1Faster than 0% of oil tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 49.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+489%)

4.78Ranks 1,739 of 1,797, lowest first25.5

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU42%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,278 t

7.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BESIKTAS BOSPHORUS
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

BESIKTAS BOSPHORUS
Oil tanker median

0.02.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BESIKTAS BOSPHORUS
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−5.8 kn	+64%	−57%	−91%	+544%	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 64%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+22%	+9%	+61%	+21%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−12%	+8%	+72%	−27%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−15%	−12%	−70%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+8%	−1%	−32%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	842	2,660	2,660	1,299	2.0	317	49.7	–
2022	not published	5,751	18,160	29,791	3,827	7.8	193	7.71	–
2021	not published	2,920	9,216	18,473	2,126	8.7	158	6.39	–
2020	not published	1,928	6,088	10,731	1,512	7.1	180	8.79	–
2019	not published	7,602	23,798	36,173	5,263	6.9	210	10.0	–
2018	not published	10,269	32,123	52,813	7,049	7.5	194	9.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	49.7	8.44	+489%	1,739 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	B
2022	not published	7.71	8.51	−9%	839 of 1,961	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	6.39	8.86	−28%	490 of 1,789	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	8.79	9.03	−3%	896 of 1,870	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	10.0	8.83	+13%	1,144 of 1,919	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	9.22	8.86	+4%	934 of 1,779	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.