Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ARTEMIS SEAWAYS

IMO: 9293428
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 4,819 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UN MARMARA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S. · part of DFDS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,626 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

121

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

81.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (−11%)

Average speed

18.9 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (+29%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,922 t

CO₂ emitted

46,481 t

Distance sailed

123,679 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,559 h

273 days, 75% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 105 (+8%)

56.6Ranks 141 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 14.4 (+19%)

10.9Faster than 90% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 73.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−23%)

47.4Ranks 70 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU49%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

525 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARTEMIS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0125.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARTEMIS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ARTEMIS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

70.080.090.0100110

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−0%	−3%	−16%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	+6%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−1%	+3%	+15%	+5%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−1%	−8%	−21%	−5%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−1%	+3%	+51%	+6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−30%	−16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+1%	−2%	−3%	+4%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	11,637	36,253	102,628	5,995	17.1	113	73.3	–
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	13,936	43,422	122,513	6,981	17.6	114	74.7	–
2023	not published	13,485	42,015	115,619	6,460	17.9	117	74.7	–
2022	not published	11,842	36,892	100,620	5,848	17.2	118	71.1	–
2021	not published	15,238	47,467	127,776	6,954	18.4	119	75.2	–
2020	not published	10,179	31,734	84,754	4,798	17.7	120	70.8	–
2019	not published	14,701	45,825	120,449	6,625	18.2	122	84.6	–
2018	not published	14,922	46,481	123,679	6,559	18.9	121	81.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	73.3	95.2	−23%	70 of 235	DNV	B
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	74.7	97.5	−23%	69 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	74.7	109	−31%	62 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	71.1	90.6	−22%	69 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	75.2	104	−27%	69 of 219	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	70.8	103	−31%	59 of 238	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	84.6	90.9	−7%	119 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	81.2	91.0	−11%	100 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.