Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

FREEDOM ACE

IMO: 9293662
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,097 t
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,097 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

100.8 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

62.85

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+14%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

250 t

CO₂ emitted

795 t

807 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,481 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

224 h

9 days, 3% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 100.8 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+1%)

79.6Ranks 265 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.4 (−23%)

12.0Faster than 4% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 62.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+14%)

34.70Ranks 294 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU34%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU18%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (571 t).

Fuel burned laden

82%

18% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

17.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−5.7 kn	+1%	−33%	−91%	–	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	−27%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	−10%	−10%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+2.8 kn	+26%	+54%	+448%	+7%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−19%	−28%	−41%	+21%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+2%	−8%	−21%	+3%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	250	795	2,481	224	11.1	100.8	62.85	82%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	2,855	8,914	28,648	1,703	16.8	99.6	–	95%
2023	not published	3,650	11,518	39,349	2,417	16.3	92.8	48.28	99%
2022	not published	4,079	12,888	43,629	2,754	15.8	93.5	53.89	77%
2020	not published	592	1,875	7,964	615	13.0	74.3	50.60	96%
2019	not published	1,245	3,899	13,535	924	14.7	92.0	41.71	97%
2018	not published	1,550	4,845	17,228	1,052	16.4	89.9	40.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	62.85	55.36	+14%	294 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	48.28	56.64	−15%	127 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	53.89	57.66	−7%	202 of 463	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	50.60	57.26	−12%	156 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	41.71	58.95	−29%	34 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	40.59	62.35	−35%	20 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.