Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

FREEDOM ACE

IMO: 9293662
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,097 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,907 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

92.0

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (−29%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,245 t

CO₂ emitted

3,899 t

Distance sailed

13,535 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

924 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 101 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+1%)

79.6Ranks 265 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.4 (−23%)

12.0Faster than 4% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 62.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+14%)

34.7Ranks 294 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU29%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,210 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

113 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FREEDOM ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.7 kn	+1%	−33%	−91%	–	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	−27%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	−10%	−10%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+2.8 kn	+26%	+54%	+448%	+7%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−19%	−28%	−41%	+21%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+2%	−8%	−21%	+3%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	250	795	2,481	224	11.1	101	62.9	82%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	2,855	8,914	28,648	1,703	16.8	99.6	–	95%
2023	not published	3,650	11,518	39,349	2,417	16.3	92.8	48.3	99%
2022	not published	4,079	12,888	43,629	2,754	15.8	93.5	53.9	77%
2020	not published	592	1,875	7,964	615	13.0	74.3	50.6	96%
2019	not published	1,245	3,899	13,535	924	14.7	92.0	41.7	97%
2018	not published	1,550	4,845	17,228	1,052	16.4	89.9	40.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	62.9	55.4	+14%	294 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	48.3	56.6	−15%	127 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	53.9	57.7	−7%	202 of 463	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	50.6	57.3	−12%	156 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	41.7	59.0	−29%	34 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	40.6	62.4	−35%	20 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.