Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VOLCAN DE TIRAJANA

IMO
9294226
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EIV 68.05 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
158
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+0%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
4,014
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+451%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
5,783
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+3,042%)
Average speed
22.6 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+40%)
Fuel per day at sea
86.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,351 t
CO₂ emitted
23,566 t
Distance sailed
46,398 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,049 h
85 days, 23% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 166 kg/nm · median 150 (+11%)
69.3Ranks 260 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 26.0 kn · median 15.8 (+65%)
12.0Faster than 95% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 915 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+61%)
66.8Ranks 279 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 3,181 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+1,156%)
48.6Ranks 390 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports95%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,103 t
4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VOLCAN DE TIRAJANA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VOLCAN DE TIRAJANA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TIRAJANA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TIRAJANA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.9 kn+1%+14%+67%−15%2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.2 kn+1%−4%+7%−5%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn−1%−2%−2%−8%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−0.6 kn+3%+1%+5%+2%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.3 kn+2%+3%+12%+6%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020+0.6 kn+0%+2%−31%+1%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019+1.7 kn−2%+5%+19%−72%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.13,28942,60380,0053,07126.0166––
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.7,85925,19647,9672,08023.1164––
2023not published7,22123,15244,7161,84024.3162––
2022not published7,44923,88245,5031,85324.6164––
2021not published6,84921,95843,2321,71625.2158––
2020not published5,98319,18138,4521,54724.9156––
2019not published8,61027,60355,3922,28224.3155––
2018not published7,35123,56646,3982,04922.6158––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.915567+61%279 of 4083,181253+1,156%Bureau VeritasB
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.1,072547+96%305 of 404706233+203%Bureau VeritasB
2023not published1,130680+66%306 of 386663234+183%Bureau VeritasA+B
2022not published1,233626+97%319 of 394693253+174%Bureau VeritasA+B
2021not published1,214815+49%274 of 377696226+208%Bureau VeritasA+B
2020not published1,147751+53%243 of 387781217+259%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published1,137569+100%308 of 3941,137223+411%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published4,014729+451%338 of 3615,783184+3,042%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.