Navalyze · Container · Ship

QUEBEC EXPRESS

IMO: 9294836
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,437 t
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,921 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

167

Container median 174 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+4%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,795 t

CO₂ emitted

43,563 t

Distance sailed

82,770 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,094 h

254 days, 70% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 152 kg/nm · median 177 (−14%)

78.8Ranks 934 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 40% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+15%)

7.22Ranks 1,272 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU52%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

13,367 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,390 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

QUEBEC EXPRESS
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

QUEBEC EXPRESS
Container median

12.513.013.514.014.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

QUEBEC EXPRESS
Container median

16.017.018.019.020.021.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	+11%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−9%	−19%	−32%	+6%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−4%	+0%	+28%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+5%	+2%	−39%	+6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+3%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−11%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	7,826	24,561	51,606	4,081	12.6	152	18.7	97%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	6,959	21,842	46,659	3,730	12.5	149	18.2	97%
2023	not published	6,594	20,705	45,443	3,613	12.6	145	18.9	97%
2022	not published	10,676	33,467	66,821	4,762	14.0	160	17.7	97%
2021	not published	8,645	27,188	52,050	3,868	13.5	166	19.3	96%
2020	not published	13,519	42,398	85,293	6,200	13.8	159	18.3	100%
2019	not published	13,795	43,563	82,770	6,094	13.6	167	19.6	97%
2018	not published	15,538	49,199	92,671	6,725	13.8	168	19.3	97%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	18.7	16.3	+15%	1,272 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	18.2	17.5	+4%	1,015 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	18.9	19.4	−3%	919 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	17.7	19.1	−7%	850 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	19.3	17.9	+8%	955 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.3	17.6	+4%	940 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	19.6	18.9	+4%	937 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	19.3	20.2	−5%	800 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.