Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

KYOTO EXPRESS

IMO
9295256
Type
Container ship
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 9.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 67,062 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
213
Container median 186 kg/nm (+15%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.0
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−44%)
Average speed
14.5 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
74.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,560 t
CO₂ emitted
17,525 t
Distance sailed
26,106 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,797 h
75 days, 21% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 255 kg/nm · median 167 (+53%)
78.9Ranks 1,479 of 1,974, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.5 (+15%)
9.6Faster than 83% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−43%)
7.33Ranks 446 of 1,974, lowest first51.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports5%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU57%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
599 t
3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KYOTO EXPRESS
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • KYOTO EXPRESS
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KYOTO EXPRESS
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024+3.1 kn−0%+24%+238%−18%3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.1 kn−3%−2%+13%−6%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−2.2 kn+24%+5%−28%+29%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021+3.0 kn−12%+11%+226%−17%3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearHL Crewmanagement GmbH00–0––––
2025Hapag-Lloyd AG00–0––––
2024HL Crewmanagement GmbH18,36357,07571,9144,64315.52559.90–
2023not published5,44017,13421,2741,70912.425612.1–
2022not published4,97915,65518,8491,53312.326412.9–
2021not published5,56017,52526,1061,79714.521310.0–
2018not published1,9446,0768,00369711.524312.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearHL Crewmanagement GmbH––––DNVB+C
2025Hapag-Lloyd AG––––DNVB+C
2024HL Crewmanagement GmbH9.9017.5−43%446 of 1,974DNVB
2023not published12.119.4−38%539 of 1,899EnvServiceB
2022not published12.919.1−33%540 of 1,825EnvServiceB
2021not published10.017.9−44%322 of 1,781DNVB
2018not published12.120.2−40%392 of 1,705DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.