Navalyze · Container · Ship

CHACABUCO

IMO: 9295957
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 40,088 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 41,985 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

192

Container median 172 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−18%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,436 t

CO₂ emitted

45,668 t

Distance sailed

75,170 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,020 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 165 kg/nm · median 177 (−7%)

78.8Ranks 1,029 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−21%)

7.22Ranks 854 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU47%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

14,436 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

735 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHACABUCO
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHACABUCO
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHACABUCO
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	−13%	−22%	−7%	−16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−1%	−4%	−9%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+0%	+8%	+12%	+9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+16%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−1%	+1%	−4%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−8%	+7%	+0%	−17%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+10%	+5%	+56%	+21%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	13,100	41,015	79,250	5,581	14.2	165	12.9	98%
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	16,236	50,869	85,160	5,419	15.7	191	15.3	99%
2023	not published	18,000	56,375	93,423	5,754	16.2	193	15.7	99%
2022	not published	16,051	50,762	83,584	5,542	15.1	192	14.5	98%
2021	not published	13,747	43,484	72,097	4,755	15.2	191	15.6	98%
2020	not published	14,436	45,668	75,170	5,020	15.0	192	14.5	100%
2019	not published	15,606	48,892	74,872	5,838	12.8	208	17.4	99%
2018	not published	9,127	28,481	48,131	3,567	13.5	190	14.4	67%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	12.9	16.3	−21%	854 of 2,208	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	15.3	17.5	−13%	841 of 1,974	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	15.7	19.4	−19%	771 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	14.5	19.1	−24%	659 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	15.6	17.9	−13%	755 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	14.5	17.6	−18%	712 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.4	18.9	−8%	806 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	14.4	20.2	−29%	512 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.