Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM SAMBHAR

IMO: 9295969
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 23,979 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,815 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

215

Container median 182 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+52%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,088 t

CO₂ emitted

37,757 t

Distance sailed

56,158 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,356 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 196 kg/nm · median 177 (+11%)

78.8Ranks 1,248 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+57%)

7.22Ranks 1,577 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU43%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,235 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM SAMBHAR
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM SAMBHAR
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM SAMBHAR
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−1%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	+1%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−1%	−4%	−3%	+3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	+8%	+19%	+321%	−43%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−10%	−2%	−67%	+61%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+1%	+15%	+11%	+19%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−10%	−15%	+4%	−26%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	17,290	54,040	88,239	5,540	15.9	196	25.5	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	16,991	53,103	88,871	5,352	16.6	191	25.7	–
2023	not published	16,595	51,917	87,965	5,479	16.1	189	26.1	–
2022	not published	17,244	54,093	90,358	5,436	16.6	191	25.2	–
2021	not published	3,789	11,937	21,468	1,427	15.0	177	43.9	–
2020	not published	12,725	40,132	64,696	4,714	13.7	197	27.2	–
2019	not published	11,339	35,428	58,238	4,830	12.1	195	22.8	–
2018	not published	12,088	37,757	56,158	4,356	12.9	215	30.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	25.5	16.3	+57%	1,577 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	25.7	17.5	+47%	1,348 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	26.1	19.4	+35%	1,227 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	25.2	19.1	+32%	1,153 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	43.9	17.9	+145%	1,526 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	27.2	17.6	+55%	1,281 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	22.8	18.9	+21%	1,060 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	30.8	20.2	+52%	1,187 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.