Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AMERICA

IMO: 9295971
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,651 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,204 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

195

Container median 174 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+23%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,335 t

CO₂ emitted

32,312 t

Distance sailed

52,967 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,581 h

191 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 190 kg/nm · median 177 (+7%)

78.8Ranks 1,206 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 13.3 (+29%)

9.1Faster than 97% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+47%)

7.22Ranks 1,521 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU31%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,999 t

9.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM AMERICA
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AMERICA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AMERICA
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+2%	+6%	+1%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+1%	+2%	−1%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+29%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−16%	−17%	−12%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	+21%	+48%	+71%	+34%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−5%	+9%	−15%	−4%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	−2%	−12%	−4%	−19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	16,766	52,422	88,496	5,188	17.1	190	24.0	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	16,251	50,828	87,341	5,335	16.4	186	25.7	–
2023	not published	16,235	50,777	88,247	5,443	16.2	184	25.6	–
2022	not published	12,834	40,154	68,299	4,266	16.0	188	24.0	–
2021	not published	17,398	54,607	77,342	4,778	16.2	225	29.8	–
2020	not published	8,420	26,309	45,229	3,427	13.2	186	22.3	–
2019	not published	10,335	32,312	52,967	4,581	11.6	195	23.3	–
2018	not published	11,005	34,393	55,385	4,298	12.9	199	28.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	24.0	16.3	+47%	1,521 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	25.7	17.5	+47%	1,348 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	25.6	19.4	+32%	1,206 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	24.0	19.1	+26%	1,117 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	29.8	17.9	+67%	1,297 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	22.3	17.6	+27%	1,111 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	23.3	18.9	+23%	1,073 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	28.7	20.2	+42%	1,147 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.