Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MINERVA ELLIE

IMO: 9297321
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 59,764 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Minerva Marine Inc · part of Minerva

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,253 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

157

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.43

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−16%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,866 t

CO₂ emitted

21,547 t

Distance sailed

43,771 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,500 h

188 days, 51% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 136 kg/nm · median 129 (+6%)

79.5Ranks 1,038 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.9 (−10%)

8.1Faster than 26% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (−11%)

4.44Ranks 722 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU51%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,638 t

7.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MINERVA ELLIE
Oil tanker median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MINERVA ELLIE
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINERVA ELLIE
Oil tanker median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−14%	−6%	+415%	+26%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+15%	+4%	−78%	−1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	−9%	+16%	−35%	−16%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	−27%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.9 kn	+2%	−17%	−2%	+1%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+4%	+20%	−9%	+8%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Minerva Marine Inc	361	1,139	3,845	400	9.6	93.9	–	–
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	3,150	9,970	23,137	2,354	9.8	136	7.21	59%
2023	not published	709	2,242	4,491	500	9.0	158	5.72	–
2022	not published	2,784	8,774	20,324	2,035	10.0	137	5.76	–
2021	not published	4,689	14,885	31,281	3,978	7.9	150	6.84	–
2020	not published	6,915	22,124	43,056	5,493	7.8	161	7.54	–
2019	not published	6,866	21,547	43,771	4,500	9.7	157	7.43	–
2018	not published	7,222	22,594	47,908	5,698	8.4	151	6.89	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Minerva Marine Inc	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	7.21	8.06	−11%	722 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	5.72	8.44	−32%	368 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	5.76	8.51	−32%	402 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	6.84	8.86	−23%	564 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	7.54	9.03	−17%	688 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	7.43	8.83	−16%	706 of 1,919	RINA	A
2018	not published	6.89	8.86	−22%	562 of 1,779	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.