Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK OHIO

IMO: 9298698
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 31,501 t
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Norfolk
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk Line, Limited-USA · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,432 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

220

Container median 182 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−14%)

Average speed

17.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+29%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,933 t

CO₂ emitted

52,897 t

Distance sailed

77,007 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,319 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 177 (+4%)

78.8Ranks 1,164 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+10%)

7.22Ranks 1,219 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU46%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,933 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

852 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK OHIO
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK OHIO
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK OHIO
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+6%	+12%	−4%	+27%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+20%	+12%	+7%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−27%	−24%	−8%	−22%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	+13%	+5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	−13%	−29%	−19%	−17%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−5%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−2%	−7%	+9%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	12,708	39,176	69,052	4,632	14.9	184	18.0	93%
2024Bio blend	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	12,475	38,495	71,575	5,110	14.0	174	14.2	98%
2023	not published	9,694	30,188	66,738	4,463	15.0	145	12.3	97%
2022	not published	14,535	44,601	72,721	5,057	14.4	200	15.8	98%
2021	not published	11,924	37,139	64,626	4,617	14.0	185	15.0	–
2020	not published	16,965	52,840	79,661	4,668	17.1	213	18.1	100%
2019	not published	18,064	56,336	83,945	4,944	17.0	215	17.2	100%
2018	not published	16,933	52,897	77,007	4,319	17.8	220	17.4	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	18.0	16.3	+10%	1,219 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	14.2	17.5	−19%	774 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.3	19.4	−36%	556 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	15.8	19.1	−17%	757 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	15.0	17.9	−16%	714 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.1	17.6	+3%	929 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.2	18.9	−9%	797 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	17.4	20.2	−14%	692 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.