Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC JUDITH

IMO: 9299549
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 70,487 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.02 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,056 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

251

Container median 174 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−30%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,612 t

CO₂ emitted

51,797 t

Distance sailed

66,095 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,331 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 268 kg/nm · median 177 (+51%)

78.8Ranks 1,788 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 32% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 779 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU39%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,595 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC JUDITH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC JUDITH
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC JUDITH
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+5%	−2%	−73%	−7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+28%	+27%	+111%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−33%	−41%	−27%	−45%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+3%	+19%	−73%	+43%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+12%	+1%	−27%	+4%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+2%	−4%	−9%	−3%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−5%	−10%	−7%	−14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	1,313	4,101	4,901	402	12.2	268	11.9	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	4,724	14,736	18,451	1,418	13.0	256	12.8	–
2023	not published	1,751	5,467	8,763	667	13.1	200	10.6	–
2022	not published	3,543	11,194	11,952	796	15.0	296	19.1	–
2021	not published	12,720	40,242	44,034	3,408	12.9	289	13.3	–
2020	not published	15,561	49,168	60,447	4,204	14.4	257	12.8	–
2019	not published	16,612	51,797	66,095	4,331	15.3	251	13.3	–
2018	not published	18,768	58,517	71,225	4,394	16.2	264	15.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	11.9	16.3	−27%	779 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	12.8	17.5	−27%	665 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	10.6	19.4	−46%	425 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	19.1	19.1	−0%	909 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	13.3	17.9	−25%	577 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	12.8	17.6	−27%	559 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	13.3	18.9	−30%	522 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	15.4	20.2	−24%	566 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.