Navalyze · Container · Ship

EAGLE II

IMO: 9301122
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,367 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HOOGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,416 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.7

Container median 172 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+156%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,085 t

CO₂ emitted

6,569 t

Distance sailed

22,737 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,960 h

82 days, 22% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 254 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+111%)

7.22Ranks 1,777 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU38%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

273 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE II
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE II
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE II
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−3%	−8%	+6%	−18%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	−0.9 kn	−13%	−19%	+90%	+5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.8 kn	−10%	+4%	+114%	−53%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+16%	+12%	−35%	+89%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+5%	+29%	−45%	+13%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+20%	+8%	−31%	+26%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	5,185	16,221	64,117	5,594	11.5	80.9	34.3	–
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	4,329	13,554	51,785	4,069	12.7	83.6	43.8	–
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	5,041	15,783	60,285	5,018	12.0	83.6	41.9	–
2022	not published	3,030	9,459	31,692	2,448	12.9	95.6	39.8	–
2021	not published	1,585	4,952	14,840	1,334	11.1	107	85.3	–
2020	not published	2,085	6,569	22,737	1,960	11.6	91.7	45.0	–
2019	not published	3,570	11,308	40,984	4,335	9.5	87.1	39.9	–
2018	not published	4,324	13,762	59,348	5,641	10.5	72.8	31.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	34.3	16.3	+111%	1,777 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	41.9	17.5	+139%	1,644 of 1,974	DNV	A
2022	not published	39.8	19.1	+108%	1,482 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	85.3	17.9	+377%	1,761 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	45.0	17.6	+156%	1,545 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	39.9	18.9	+111%	1,420 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	31.8	20.2	+57%	1,199 of 1,705	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.