Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC EAGLE III

IMO: 9302449
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 13,687 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK DAKAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,687 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

105.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+50%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,235 t

CO₂ emitted

10,251 t

10,409 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,731 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,867 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 105.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−41%)

78.8Ranks 581 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+50%)

7.22Ranks 1,535 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU35%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU5%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,099 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC EAGLE III
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC EAGLE III
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC EAGLE III
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+5.5 kn	−16%	+74%	+98%	−28%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−6.1 kn	+40%	−36%	+72%	−59%	6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−33%	−41%	+117%	+161%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	+19%	+36%	−66%	−13%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+7%	+1%	−68%	+73%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−18%	−31%	+101%	−11%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,235	10,251	30,731	2,867	10.7	105.3	24.37	–
2024part-year	Maersk A/S	463	1,446	4,453	700	6.4	103.9	36.04	80%
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,939	6,057	15,515	2,985	5.2	125.0	33.89	19%
2023	not published	805	2,512	9,010	797	11.3	89.4	81.86	56%
2022	not published	551	1,715	4,153	322	12.9	132.6	31.41	99%
2021	not published	1,342	4,190	12,099	1,070	11.3	111.0	36.16	–
2020	not published	3,919	12,227	37,888	3,147	12.0	103.4	20.96	100%
2019	not published	2,369	7,413	18,879	1,304	14.5	125.5	23.48	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	24.37	16.30	+50%	1,535 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Maersk A/S	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	33.89	17.52	+93%	1,534 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	81.86	19.40	+322%	1,882 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	31.41	19.13	+64%	1,325 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	36.16	17.90	+102%	1,427 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	20.96	17.58	+19%	1,053 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	23.48	18.88	+24%	1,082 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.