Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ROMA

IMO: 9304447
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 56,667 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 79,945 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

325

Container median 178 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−34%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

116.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,729 t

CO₂ emitted

49,003 t

Distance sailed

48,417 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,245 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 327 kg/nm · median 177 (+85%)

78.8Ranks 2,093 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 58% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+10%)

7.22Ranks 1,217 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU39%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,823 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ROMA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ROMA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ROMA
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+3%	−1%	+3%	+31%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+14%	+15%	+3%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−14%	−17%	−16%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−0%	−1%	−30%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+14%	+14%	+250%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.3 kn	+30%	+101%	+1,432%	+69%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	14,084	43,910	43,049	3,100	13.9	327	18.0	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13,267	41,324	41,757	2,886	14.5	318	13.8	–
2023	not published	11,314	35,242	40,571	2,827	14.4	279	12.4	–
2022	not published	15,729	49,003	48,417	3,245	14.9	325	12.7	–
2021	not published	22,548	70,267	69,167	4,591	15.1	326	13.2	–
2020	not published	5,655	17,667	19,767	1,307	15.1	286	15.8	–
2019	not published	284	886	1,290	132	9.8	220	9.35	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	18.0	16.3	+10%	1,217 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.8	17.5	−21%	742 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	12.4	19.4	−36%	560 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	12.7	19.1	−34%	526 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	13.2	17.9	−26%	563 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	15.8	17.6	−10%	780 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	9.35	18.9	−50%	281 of 1,788	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.