Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK UTAH

IMO: 9305300
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 27,346 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,343 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

185

Container median 172 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−7%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,744 t

CO₂ emitted

39,689 t

Distance sailed

68,810 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,608 h

192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 160 kg/nm · median 177 (−10%)

78.8Ranks 989 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+12%)

7.22Ranks 1,239 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU47%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

12,744 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

873 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK UTAH
Container median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK UTAH
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK UTAH
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−6%	−10%	+13%	−51%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	+0.3 kn	−5%	−2%	+1,883%	+83%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+5%	+10%	−90%	+12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	−9%	−22%	−72%	+11%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+3%	−4%	+43%	+3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	6,972	21,763	43,703	3,321	13.2	160	18.2	100%
2024	Maersk A/S	6,609	20,520	38,828	2,840	13.7	170	37.0	68%
2022	not published	349	1,089	1,958	146	13.4	178	20.2	96%
2021	not published	3,265	10,194	19,311	1,505	12.8	169	18.1	–
2020	not published	12,744	39,689	68,810	4,608	14.9	185	16.3	100%
2019	not published	8,615	26,964	48,066	2,978	16.1	179	15.9	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	18.2	16.3	+12%	1,239 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	37.0	17.5	+111%	1,573 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022	not published	20.2	19.1	+6%	956 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	18.1	17.9	+1%	896 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.3	17.6	−7%	810 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.9	18.9	−16%	713 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.